Cocaine: Difference between revisions
| [pending revision] | [pending revision] |
Assign pharmacological categories from List_of_CNS-active_medicines |
MDElliottMD (talk | contribs) Recategorize: Stimulants -> Psychostimulants |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
{{PendellsCorner | |||
| quote = Buying cocaine is buying the desire itself, the desire itself is the product. A devilish perfection. ... The desire, the consumerism, is too blatant, too obvious: a parody of the holy rite, and hence condemned with all the fury of the Inquisition.<br><br>A citizen set fire to a house because it was a "crackhouse." Though he admitted setting the fire, the jury found him not guilty, using jury annulment: an auto-da-fé for the Holy Cause is not crime. | |||
| volume = Dynamis | |||
| page = 178 | |||
}} | |||
[[Category:Psychostimulants]] | [[Category:Psychostimulants]] | ||
[[Category:Psychostimulants]] | |||
[[Category:Local Anesthetics]] | |||
[[Category:Anesthetics]] | |||
Latest revision as of 10:50, 17 May 2026
Stimulant, Local anesthetic
Cocaine
Experience
No personal reports yet
No clinical reports yet
Log in to add your own experience.
Problems
No problems yet. Be the first to suggest one.
+ Add a problemTitration strategies
No titration strategies yet. Be the first to suggest one.
Effects
No effects listed yet. Be the first to suggest one.
Interactions
No interactions reported yet.
Relevant anecdote
No anecdotes yet. Share a relevant one.
Relevant Literature
No literature entries yet.
Log in to submit relevant literature.
Summary
Classes
Stimulant, Local anesthetic
Pharmacy
Pharmacology
Purported mechanism
Monoamine reuptake inhibitor; sodium channel blocker
“Pendell's corner
Buying cocaine is buying the desire itself, the desire itself is the product. A devilish perfection. ... The desire, the consumerism, is too blatant, too obvious: a parody of the holy rite, and hence condemned with all the fury of the Inquisition.
A citizen set fire to a house because it was a "crackhouse." Though he admitted setting the fire, the jury found him not guilty, using jury annulment: an auto-da-fé for the Holy Cause is not crime.
A citizen set fire to a house because it was a "crackhouse." Though he admitted setting the fire, the jury found him not guilty, using jury annulment: an auto-da-fé for the Holy Cause is not crime.
— Dale Pendell, Pharmako/Dynamis, p. 178