Jump to content

Category:Phenethylamines: Difference between revisions

From Pharmacopedia
Build Category:Phenethylamines: history-first MedCategory page with five verbatim Pendell quotes from Pharmako/Gnosis peyote chapter (pp 86-90), Heffter/Spath/Shulgin history, NBOMe safety, mechanism, citations.
Apply Category:Medicines link rule: wikilink every prose occurrence of mescaline (x11), peyote (x9), amphetamine (x4), MDMA (x2), methamphetamine (x1). PendellsCorner quote text and refs untouched.
Line 4: Line 4:
The breadth is striking: the body's own signalling molecules: dopamine,
The breadth is striking: the body's own signalling molecules: dopamine,
noradrenaline, and adrenaline are phenethylamines; so are the stimulants
noradrenaline, and adrenaline are phenethylamines; so are the stimulants
amphetamine and methamphetamine; so is the empathogen MDMA; so are the
[[Amphetamine|amphetamine]] and [[Methamphetamine|methamphetamine]]; so is the empathogen [[MDMA]]; so are the
[[:Category:Psychostimulants|psychostimulant]] cathinones; and so are a number
[[:Category:Psychostimulants|psychostimulant]] cathinones; and so are a number
of ordinary medicines, among them some decongestants and bronchodilators. This
of ordinary medicines, among them some decongestants and bronchodilators. This
page concerns one particular branch of that family: the '''psychedelic
page concerns one particular branch of that family: the '''psychedelic
phenethylamines''', the serotonergic, vision-producing members, of which the
phenethylamines''', the serotonergic, vision-producing members, of which the
oldest and most famous is mescaline.<ref name="mescaline-revival">Vamvakopoulou IA, Narine KAD. Mescaline: The forgotten psychedelic. ''Neuropharmacology''. 2023 Jan 1;222:109294. PMID: 36252614.</ref> Their history, like that of the
oldest and most famous is [[Mescaline|mescaline]].<ref name="mescaline-revival">Vamvakopoulou IA, Narine KAD. Mescaline: The forgotten psychedelic. ''Neuropharmacology''. 2023 Jan 1;222:109294. PMID: 36252614.</ref> Their history, like that of the
[[:Category:Tryptamines|tryptamine psychedelics]], is best told as a history of
[[:Category:Tryptamines|tryptamine psychedelics]], is best told as a history of
people, and it begins with a cactus.
people, and it begins with a cactus.


== Peyote and the first psychedelic ==
== Peyote and the first psychedelic ==
Mescaline is the active principle of '''peyote''' (''Lophophora williamsii''),
[[Mescaline]] is the active principle of '''[[Peyote|peyote]]''' (''Lophophora williamsii''),
a small, spineless cactus of the deserts of northern Mexico and the southern
a small, spineless cactus of the deserts of northern Mexico and the southern
United States, and of related cacti including the San Pedro. Peyote is among
United States, and of related cacti including the San Pedro. [[Peyote]] is among
the most anciently used psychoactive plants known: dried peyote buttons
the most anciently used psychoactive plants known: dried [[Peyote|peyote]] buttons
recovered from caves in Texas and Mexico have been dated to several thousand
recovered from caves in Texas and Mexico have been dated to several thousand
years before the present, and it has been used ceremonially and medicinally by
years before the present, and it has been used ceremonially and medicinally by
Line 29: Line 29:


That long tradition was met, after the Spanish conquest, with sustained
That long tradition was met, after the Spanish conquest, with sustained
persecution. The Catholic Church treated the divinatory use of peyote as
persecution. The Catholic Church treated the divinatory use of [[Peyote|peyote]] as
evidence of a pact with the devil, and the Inquisition condemned it; peyote
evidence of a pact with the devil, and the Inquisition condemned it; [[Peyote|peyote]]
ceremonies survived chiefly among peoples such as the Huichol, the Cora, and
ceremonies survived chiefly among peoples such as the Huichol, the Cora, and
the Tarahumara, who could retreat into terrain remote enough to escape the
the Tarahumara, who could retreat into terrain remote enough to escape the
Line 42: Line 42:


Not every voice of the period was condemnatory. As early as 1591 the physician
Not every voice of the period was condemnatory. As early as 1591 the physician
Juan de Cárdenas argued that peyote's effects were a matter of its natural
Juan de Cárdenas argued that [[Peyote|peyote]]'s effects were a matter of its natural
properties, not of the supernatural, a strikingly early statement of what
properties, not of the supernatural, a strikingly early statement of what
would now be called a pharmacological view.
would now be called a pharmacological view.
Line 62: Line 62:
}}
}}


In the nineteenth century peyote drew the attention of Western science. The
In the nineteenth century [[Peyote|peyote]] drew the attention of Western science. The
German toxicologist Louis Lewin examined the cactus in the 1880s, and in 1897
German toxicologist Louis Lewin examined the cactus in the 1880s, and in 1897
the chemist '''Arthur Heffter''', working in Leipzig, isolated its principal
the chemist '''Arthur Heffter''', working in Leipzig, isolated its principal
active alkaloid and, by a series of self-experiments, identified it as the
active alkaloid and, by a series of self-experiments, identified it as the
substance responsible for peyote's visions. He named it '''mescaline'''. In
substance responsible for [[Peyote|peyote]]'s visions. He named it '''[[Mescaline|mescaline]]'''. In
1919 the Viennese chemist '''Ernst Späth''' achieved the first complete
1919 the Viennese chemist '''Ernst Späth''' achieved the first complete
synthesis of mescaline, making it the first psychedelic substance both
synthesis of [[Mescaline|mescaline]], making it the first psychedelic substance both
identified and made in the laboratory.<ref name="psychedelic-history">Nichols DE, Nichols CD. History of psychedelic drug science and molecular pharmacology. ''International Review of Neurobiology''. 2025. PMID: 40541313.</ref> Mescaline became, for the first half of
identified and made in the laboratory.<ref name="psychedelic-history">Nichols DE, Nichols CD. History of psychedelic drug science and molecular pharmacology. ''International Review of Neurobiology''. 2025. PMID: 40541313.</ref> [[Mescaline]] became, for the first half of
the twentieth century, the standard tool for the scientific study of
the twentieth century, the standard tool for the scientific study of
visionary states, and its literary fame was secured when Aldous Huxley
visionary states, and its literary fame was secured when Aldous Huxley
described his own mescaline experience in ''The Doors of Perception'' in 1954.<ref name="huxley1954">Huxley A. ''The Doors of Perception''. London: Chatto & Windus; 1954.</ref>
described his own [[Mescaline|mescaline]] experience in ''The Doors of Perception'' in 1954.<ref name="huxley1954">Huxley A. ''The Doors of Perception''. London: Chatto & Windus; 1954.</ref>


{{PendellsCorner
{{PendellsCorner
Line 84: Line 84:
The modern history of the psychedelic phenethylamines is, to an unusual degree,
The modern history of the psychedelic phenethylamines is, to an unusual degree,
the work of one person: the chemist '''Dr. Alexander "Sasha" Shulgin'''.
the work of one person: the chemist '''Dr. Alexander "Sasha" Shulgin'''.
Beginning in the 1960s, Shulgin took the mescaline molecule as a template and
Beginning in the 1960s, Shulgin took the [[Mescaline|mescaline]] molecule as a template and
systematically varied it, synthesizing and then personally evaluating, first
systematically varied it, synthesizing and then personally evaluating, first
on himself, then with his wife Ann and a small circle of friends, a great
on himself, then with his wife Ann and a small circle of friends, a great
Line 104: Line 104:
== Prohibition and revival ==
== Prohibition and revival ==
As with the other classical psychedelics, the psychedelic phenethylamines were
As with the other classical psychedelics, the psychedelic phenethylamines were
brought under strict legal control: mescaline was placed in the most
brought under strict legal control: [[Mescaline|mescaline]] was placed in the most
restrictive category of control in the United States by the early 1970s, with
restrictive category of control in the United States by the early 1970s, with
a narrow exemption for the religious use of peyote by the Native American
a narrow exemption for the religious use of [[Peyote|peyote]] by the Native American
Church, and the later synthetic phenethylamines were controlled as they
Church, and the later synthetic phenethylamines were controlled as they
appeared. Research nonetheless continued at a low level and has revived in
appeared. Research nonetheless continued at a low level and has revived in
recent years, with renewed scientific and commercial interest in mescaline and
recent years, with renewed scientific and commercial interest in [[Mescaline|mescaline]] and
related substances as possible treatments in psychiatry;<ref name="mescaline-revival" /> as of the mid-2020s
related substances as possible treatments in psychiatry;<ref name="mescaline-revival" /> as of the mid-2020s
this work is at an early stage and these remain investigational rather than
this work is at an early stage and these remain investigational rather than
Line 116: Line 116:
== Members ==
== Members ==
The psychedelic phenethylamines fall into several groups. At the head of the
The psychedelic phenethylamines fall into several groups. At the head of the
family stands '''mescaline''', the naturally occurring member. The largest
family stands '''[[Mescaline|mescaline]]''', the naturally occurring member. The largest
synthetic groups are the [[:Category:2C-x series|2C-x series]], covered as a
synthetic groups are the [[:Category:2C-x series|2C-x series]], covered as a
class on its own page, and the DOx series, the latter being the
class on its own page, and the DOx series, the latter being the
amphetamine-type relatives, longer-acting and more potent. A further group, the
[[Amphetamine|amphetamine]]-type relatives, longer-acting and more potent. A further group, the
'''NBOMe series''', consists of N-benzyl derivatives of the 2C compounds; these
'''NBOMe series''', consists of N-benzyl derivatives of the 2C compounds; these
are far more potent than their parents and, as noted below, considerably more
are far more potent than their parents and, as noted below, considerably more
dangerous. The list is not exhaustive, and the boundaries of the family are
dangerous. The list is not exhaustive, and the boundaries of the family are
drawn differently by different authorities. The broader, non-psychedelic
drawn differently by different authorities. The broader, non-psychedelic
phenethylamines, the amphetamine-type stimulants, MDMA and the other
phenethylamines, the [[Amphetamine|amphetamine]]-type stimulants, [[MDMA]] and the other
empathogens, the cathinones, are treated under their own categories.
empathogens, the cathinones, are treated under their own categories.


Line 137: Line 137:
substances act at the 5-HT2A receptor is well established; how that receptor
substances act at the 5-HT2A receptor is well established; how that receptor
activity gives rise to the actual psychedelic experience is far less well
activity gives rise to the actual psychedelic experience is far less well
understood and remains a subject of active research. The amphetamine-type
understood and remains a subject of active research. The [[Amphetamine|amphetamine]]-type
members, such as the DOx compounds, also carry the structural features of a
members, such as the DOx compounds, also carry the structural features of a
stimulant, which contributes to their long duration and their effects on the
stimulant, which contributes to their long duration and their effects on the
Line 144: Line 144:
== Safety ==
== Safety ==
The psychedelic phenethylamines do not all carry the same risks, and the
The psychedelic phenethylamines do not all carry the same risks, and the
differences between them matter a great deal. Mescaline itself, used in the
differences between them matter a great deal. [[Mescaline]] itself, used in the
forms in which it has the longest record, has a low potential for the kind of
forms in which it has the longest record, has a low potential for the kind of
physical dependence associated with substances such as opioids; its
physical dependence associated with substances such as opioids; its

Revision as of 18:46, 18 May 2026

The phenethylamines are one of the largest and most varied families in all of pharmacology, a family defined by a simple shared chemical skeleton, the phenethylamine structure, from which an enormous range of substances is built. The breadth is striking: the body's own signalling molecules: dopamine, noradrenaline, and adrenaline are phenethylamines; so are the stimulants amphetamine and methamphetamine; so is the empathogen MDMA; so are the psychostimulant cathinones; and so are a number of ordinary medicines, among them some decongestants and bronchodilators. This page concerns one particular branch of that family: the psychedelic phenethylamines, the serotonergic, vision-producing members, of which the oldest and most famous is mescaline.[1] Their history, like that of the tryptamine psychedelics, is best told as a history of people, and it begins with a cactus.

Peyote and the first psychedelic

Mescaline is the active principle of peyote (Lophophora williamsii), a small, spineless cactus of the deserts of northern Mexico and the southern United States, and of related cacti including the San Pedro. Peyote is among the most anciently used psychoactive plants known: dried peyote buttons recovered from caves in Texas and Mexico have been dated to several thousand years before the present, and it has been used ceremonially and medicinally by the indigenous peoples of the region for a very long time.

Pendell's corner
This same site yielded two peyote plants reportedly radiocarbon dated to around 5000 BCE, making peyote the oldest hallucinogen known to have been used by human beings.
— Dale Pendell, Pharmako/Gnosis, p. 86

That long tradition was met, after the Spanish conquest, with sustained persecution. The Catholic Church treated the divinatory use of peyote as evidence of a pact with the devil, and the Inquisition condemned it; peyote ceremonies survived chiefly among peoples such as the Huichol, the Cora, and the Tarahumara, who could retreat into terrain remote enough to escape the authorities.

Pendell's corner
In a manual listing questions that priests should ask of Indian penitents, the question "Have you eaten peyote?" follows "Have you killed anyone?" and "Have you eaten the flesh of man?"
— Dale Pendell, Pharmako/Gnosis, p. 89

Not every voice of the period was condemnatory. As early as 1591 the physician Juan de Cárdenas argued that peyote's effects were a matter of its natural properties, not of the supernatural, a strikingly early statement of what would now be called a pharmacological view.

Pendell's corner
It is completely false to say that the herb out of its virtue makes the devil appear.
— Juan de Cárdenas, 1591 (quoted in Pharmako/Gnosis), p. 89

Pendell, writing in our own time, draws the line from that history straight to the present.

Pendell's corner
After four hundred years, the persecution of those who use psychedelic plants or substances or who smoke marijuana still has a religious fervor. (A man in Virginia was recently sentenced to four hundred years in prison for selling hallucinogens!) "Drug" users, to these religious fanatics, are worse than criminals, they are heretics for whom no punishment is too severe. Somewhere, nailed to a cross and wearing a crown of thorns on His head, a tear must fall from Jesus' eye.
— Dale Pendell, Pharmako/Gnosis, p. 90

In the nineteenth century peyote drew the attention of Western science. The German toxicologist Louis Lewin examined the cactus in the 1880s, and in 1897 the chemist Arthur Heffter, working in Leipzig, isolated its principal active alkaloid and, by a series of self-experiments, identified it as the substance responsible for peyote's visions. He named it mescaline. In 1919 the Viennese chemist Ernst Späth achieved the first complete synthesis of mescaline, making it the first psychedelic substance both identified and made in the laboratory.[2] Mescaline became, for the first half of the twentieth century, the standard tool for the scientific study of visionary states, and its literary fame was secured when Aldous Huxley described his own mescaline experience in The Doors of Perception in 1954.[3]

Pendell's corner
For there is in consciousness a Magic with which one can go beyond things. And Peyote tells us where this Magic is, and after what strange concretions, whose breath is atavistically compressed and obstructed, the Fantastic can emerge and can once again scatter in our consciousness its phosphorescence and its haze.
— Antonin Artaud, The Peyote Rite Among the Tarahumara (quoted in Pharmako/Gnosis), p. 90

Shulgin and the synthetic phenethylamines

The modern history of the psychedelic phenethylamines is, to an unusual degree, the work of one person: the chemist Dr. Alexander "Sasha" Shulgin. Beginning in the 1960s, Shulgin took the mescaline molecule as a template and systematically varied it, synthesizing and then personally evaluating, first on himself, then with his wife Ann and a small circle of friends, a great number of new substances. This work produced whole families of psychedelic phenethylamines, among them the 2C-x series and the DOx series, and established much of what is understood about how small changes in chemical structure change psychedelic effect.

In 1991 Alexander and Ann Shulgin published PiHKAL, the title an acronym for Phenethylamines i Have Known And Loved, which combined an autobiographical account with detailed descriptions of some two hundred substances.[4] The book made the chemistry public in a way nothing before it had, and several of the substances first described in it, 2C-B among them, went on to wide use. In 1994, two years after publication, Shulgin's laboratory was raided by the United States Drug Enforcement Administration. The 2C-x series, the best known of these families, is covered in detail on its own page; this page treats the psychedelic phenethylamines as a whole.

Prohibition and revival

As with the other classical psychedelics, the psychedelic phenethylamines were brought under strict legal control: mescaline was placed in the most restrictive category of control in the United States by the early 1970s, with a narrow exemption for the religious use of peyote by the Native American Church, and the later synthetic phenethylamines were controlled as they appeared. Research nonetheless continued at a low level and has revived in recent years, with renewed scientific and commercial interest in mescaline and related substances as possible treatments in psychiatry;[1] as of the mid-2020s this work is at an early stage and these remain investigational rather than approved medicines.

Members

The psychedelic phenethylamines fall into several groups. At the head of the family stands mescaline, the naturally occurring member. The largest synthetic groups are the 2C-x series, covered as a class on its own page, and the DOx series, the latter being the amphetamine-type relatives, longer-acting and more potent. A further group, the NBOMe series, consists of N-benzyl derivatives of the 2C compounds; these are far more potent than their parents and, as noted below, considerably more dangerous. The list is not exhaustive, and the boundaries of the family are drawn differently by different authorities. The broader, non-psychedelic phenethylamines, the amphetamine-type stimulants, MDMA and the other empathogens, the cathinones, are treated under their own categories.

Mechanisms

The psychedelic phenethylamines are understood to produce their effects, like the tryptamine psychedelics, chiefly by acting as agonists at a particular serotonin receptor, the 5-HT2A receptor, that is, by binding to that receptor and activating it. This shared action is thought to be the common thread linking the psychedelic phenethylamines to the chemically quite different tryptamine psychedelics, and it is why the two families are grouped together as the "classical" or serotonergic psychedelics. That these substances act at the 5-HT2A receptor is well established; how that receptor activity gives rise to the actual psychedelic experience is far less well understood and remains a subject of active research. The amphetamine-type members, such as the DOx compounds, also carry the structural features of a stimulant, which contributes to their long duration and their effects on the cardiovascular system.

Safety

The psychedelic phenethylamines do not all carry the same risks, and the differences between them matter a great deal. Mescaline itself, used in the forms in which it has the longest record, has a low potential for the kind of physical dependence associated with substances such as opioids; its characteristic acute effects include nausea and vomiting, a marked rise in heart rate and blood pressure, and the psychological risks common to all psychedelics: acute fear or distress, and the possibility of precipitating or worsening a psychotic illness in those who are predisposed to one.

The NBOMe series is a different and more serious matter, and the distinction is important. These substances are extremely potent, active in amounts measured in micrograms, and they have been associated with severe poisonings and with deaths, through effects including seizures, dangerously high body temperature, breakdown of muscle tissue, and kidney failure.[5] Because they can resemble other psychedelics in their effects but are vastly more potent, NBOMe substances have been sold deceptively as other drugs, sometimes as 2C-B, sometimes on blotter resembling LSD, with dangerous consequences for people who did not know what they had taken. Figures for all these risks are population estimates that vary between studies, and individual response varies considerably between people.

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Vamvakopoulou IA, Narine KAD. Mescaline: The forgotten psychedelic. Neuropharmacology. 2023 Jan 1;222:109294. PMID: 36252614.
  2. Nichols DE, Nichols CD. History of psychedelic drug science and molecular pharmacology. International Review of Neurobiology. 2025. PMID: 40541313.
  3. Huxley A. The Doors of Perception. London: Chatto & Windus; 1954.
  4. Shulgin A, Shulgin A. PiHKAL: A Chemical Love Story. Berkeley, CA: Transform Press; 1991.
  5. Zawilska JB, Kacela M. NBOMes, Highly Potent and Toxic Alternatives of LSD. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 2020;14:78. PMID: 32174803.